5.6 - Interest Groups Influencing Policymaking

Interest Groups and Their Purpose

• Specific vs. general interests: some groups focus on one narrow issue, like the National Rifle Association (gun rights). Others speak for a broad group on many issues, like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (business), the AFL-CIO (labor unions), or AARP (people 50 and older).

• Economic vs. public interest groups: economic groups (businesses, unions, and professional groups like the American Medical Association) seek benefits for their own members. Public interest groups (like the Sierra Club or Common Cause) push for causes they say benefit everyone, not just members.

Tactics for Influencing Policy

• Lobbying Congress and the Executive: hiring lobbyists who provide information, help draft legislation, testify at hearings, and apply pressure, sometimes by threatening to pull campaign funding or mobilizing grassroots pressure.

• Educating Voters and Officeholders: groups publish research, voter guides, and scorecards that rate how each member of Congress voted on the group's issues. Lawmakers and their staff often rely on groups for expert information when writing bills.

• Influencing Bureaucracy: working within iron triangles to secure favorable regulations from agency decision-makers.
• Iron triangle: a lasting three-way relationship between an interest group, a congressional committee, and a federal agency (see 2.12). Example: farm groups, the Agriculture Committees, and the Department of Agriculture work together on farm subsidies.
• Across party lines: most groups are part of one party's coalition (labor unions mostly back Democrats, gun rights groups mostly back Republicans). But iron triangles and looser issue networks (groups, staffers, agency experts, academics, and think tanks focused on one policy area) let groups keep their influence no matter which party is in power.

• Grassroots and Voter Mobilization: direct outreach to citizens, GOTV campaigns, advertising, and protests.

• Electioneering: groups endorse candidates, give money through their PACs (see 5.11), and run ads. Since Citizens United v. FEC (2010), corporations, unions, and other groups can spend unlimited amounts on independent ads for or against candidates, which greatly increased their power in elections.

• Lobbying the Courts: filing amicus curiae briefs or pursuing litigation directly, especially effective when constitutional rights are at stake or legislative change seems unlikely.
• Examples: the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, led by Thurgood Marshall, brought the lawsuits that became Brown v. Board of Education (1954). Gun rights groups backed the lawsuit in McDonald v. Chicago (2010), where the Court applied the Second Amendment to the states.

Benefits of Interest Groups

• Representation between elections: groups let people push for their views on specific issues all year, not just on Election Day, and give a voice to minorities that could be outvoted.

• Expertise: lobbyists give lawmakers detailed information and data they wouldn't have time to collect themselves.

• Participation: groups get members involved in politics by contacting officials, joining protests, or voting.

• Pluralism: when many groups compete, no single group can dominate policy, which is what Madison hoped for in Federalist No. 10.
• Madison (1787) defined a faction as a group "united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community." Interest groups fit that description. Since removing the causes of faction would destroy liberty, his answer was a large republic with so many competing groups that none could easily take over.
• Critics answer that the competition isn't equal: groups with more money and members win more often (see the concerns below).

Concerns About Interest Group Influence

• Elite Democracy Concern: policymakers may end up prioritizing special interests over their own constituents.

• Inequality of Resources: large, well-funded groups (like AARP) dominate policy areas that smaller groups can't compete in.
• AARP has tens of millions of members who vote at high rates, plus a lot of money, so lawmakers are careful about cutting Social Security or Medicare.

• Unequal Access: better-funded and larger groups get more face time with policymakers.

• The Revolving Door: members of Congress retiring into lucrative lobbying jobs raises concerns that they favor interest groups while still in office, angling for their next career move.

• The Free Rider Problem: non-members benefit from a group's advocacy without contributing, which weakens the incentive to join. Groups counter this with selective benefits available only to members.
• Example: AARP offers members discounts on insurance and travel plus a magazine. Small groups whose members each have a lot at stake (like a few big companies in one industry) find it easier to organize than huge groups whose members each have a little at stake (like all consumers).

Big picture